Drug Addiction, ‘Personhood’ and the War on Women

Criminal charges are now being brought against women in Alabama for “chemical endangerment of a child” which has been utilized to penalize mothers who use drugs during their pregnancy and has a mandatory sentence of 10 years to life (if the baby dies).

Originally enacted to protect children from meth labs, the law prohibits a “responsible person” from “exposing a child to an environment in which he or she…knowingly, recklessly  or intentionally causes or permits a child to be exposed to, to ingest or inhale, or to have contact with a controlled substance, chemical substance or drug paraphernalia.”

http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/04/26/drug-addiction-personhood-and-the-war-on-women/

 

Source: Time.com – April 26, 2012

Why Xanax is the Most Popular Anti-Anxiety Drug in America


So reliably relaxing are the effects of benzodiazepines that ­SAMHSA’s director of substance-abuse treatment, H. Westley Clark, says they’ve gained a reputation as “alcohol in a pill.” And their consumption can be equally informal. Just as friends pour wine for friends in times of crisis, so too do doctors, moved by the angst of their patients, “have sympathy and prescribe more,” says Clark. There are a lot more benzos circulating these days, and a lot more sharing.

http://nymag.com/news/features/xanax-2012-3/

Source: New York Magazine – March 18, 2012

Study: Benzodiazepine Update: Alprazolam and Other Benzodiazepine Use Among People Who Inject Drugs

The use of benzodiazepines among people who use illicit drugs is complex as reasons for use are not always straightforward and use does not necessarily infer abuse. On the other hand, higher dosing than prescribed is common among drug users (Nielsen et al. 2008) and use in combination with drugs such as heroin and alcohol is likely to promote adverse effects.

http://ndarc.med.unsw.edu.au/sites/ndarc.cms.med.unsw.edu.au/files/ndarc/resources/IDRS%20April%202012.pdf

Source: McIlwraith, F., Hickey, S., and Alati, R. (April 2012). Benzodiazepine update: alprazolam and other benzodiazepine use among people who inject drugs. IDRS Drug Trends Bulletin April 2012, Sydney: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, The University of New South Wales.

Research Abstract: Return to Drug Use and Overdose after Release from Prison: A Qualitative Study of Risk and Protective Factors

Background: Former inmates are at high risk for death from drug overdose, especially in the immediate post-release period. The purpose of the study is to understand the drug use experiences, perceptions of overdose risk, and experiences with overdose among former prisoners.

Methods: This qualitative study included former prison inmates (N = 29) who were recruited within two months after their release. Interviewers conducted in-person, semi-structured interviews which explored participants’ experiences and perceptions. Transcripts were analyzed utilizing a team-based method of inductive analysis.

Results: The following themes emerged: 1) Relapse to drugs and alcohol occurred in a context of poor social support, medical co-morbidity and inadequate economic resources; 2) former inmates experienced ubiquitous exposure to drugs in their living environments; 3) intentionaloverdose was considered “a way out” given situational stressors, and accidental overdose was perceived as related to decreased tolerance; and 4) protective factors included structured drug treatment programs, spirituality/religion, community-based resources (including self-help groups), and family.

Conclusions: Former inmates return to environments that strongly trigger relapse to drug use and put them at risk for overdose. Interventions to prevent overdose after release from prison may benefit from including structured treatment with gradual transition to the community, enhanced protective factors, and reductions of environmental triggers to use drugs.

The provisional PDF is available online at:  http://www.ascpjournal.org/content/pdf/1940-0640-7-3.pdf

Source: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 2012, 7:3 doi:10.1186/1940-0640-7-3 – Provisional PDF March 19, 2012

Length of Time from First Use to Adult Substance Abuse Treatment Admission – TEDS Admission Data 2009

To reduce the negative consequences of substance abuse, it is important for individuals who need treatment to receive treatment services as soon as possible. However, the length of time between first use of a substance to treatment entry for abuse of that substance can be substantial.

The length of time between first use and entry into substance abuse treatment differed by primary substance of abuse. Adult first-time alcohol admissions had the longest duration of use with an average of 20.2 years between first use and treatment entry. The duration of use among first-time cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and stimulant admissions ranged from 12 to 14 years. The shortest duration of use was for first-time prescription drug admissions with an average of 7.8 years between first use and treatment entry.

lengty of time from first time admissions chart

Discussion

The years between first use and treatment admission suggest that there may have been missed opportunities for intervention. Culturally appropriate outreach services that help individuals recognize the need for and potential benefits of treatment may help to ensure that individuals in need of treatment receive services sooner rather than later, thus giving them the best chances for successful recovery.

The shorter duration of use prior to first treatment for prescription drugs than for other substances may indicate a high potential for problematic substance use patterns to develop quickly. Therefore it is critical that physicians and other health professionals be vigilant in looking for signs of misuse of these drugs so that intervention can occur as soon as possible.

http://www.atforum.com/addiction-resources/documents/WEB_TEDS_026_HTML_000.pdf

Source: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (September 29, 2011). The TEDS Report: Length of Time from First Use to Adult Treatment Admission. Rockville, MD.

SAMHSA Publishes Two New Advisory Publications on Tobacco Use Cessation During Substance Abuse Treatment Counseling

 

SAMHSA’s “Tobacco Use Cessation During Substance Abuse Treatment Counseling,” Advisory, Volume 10, Issue 2, offers substance abuse treatment counselors a brief introduction to tobacco use cessation techniques that can be used during substance abuse treatment. The Advisory also provides resources for additional information on the topic. http://www.atforum.com/addiction-resources/documents/TobaccoCessationAdvisory.pdf

“Tobacco Use Cessation Policies in Substance Abuse Treatment: Administrative Issues,” Advisory, Volume 10, Issue 3, provides program administrators with a brief introduction to implementing tobacco-free policies and practices in treatment settings. http://www.atforum.com/addiction-resources/documents/TobaccoCessationAdministrativeIssues.pdf

Source: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration – October, 2011 

National Survey Shows a Rise in Illicit Drug Use from 2008 To 2010

The use of illicit drugs among Americans increased between 2008 and 2010 according to a national survey conducted by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) shows that 22.6 million Americans 12 or older (8.9 percent of the population) were current illicit drug users. The rate of use in 2010 was similar to the rate in 2009 (8.7 percent), but remained above the 2008 rate (8 percent).An increased rate in the current use of marijuana seems to be one of the prime factors in the overall rise in illicit drug use. Another disturbing trend is the continuing rise in the rate of current illicit drug use among young adults aged 18 to 25—from 19.6 percent in 2008 to 21.5 percent in 2010. This increase was also driven in large part by a rise in the rate of current marijuana use among this population.

Non-Medical Use of Pain Relievers

  • In 2010, the number of new users of pain relievers was 2.0 million, a number that has remained fairly constant since 2005 and was a decrease from 2002, 2003, and 2004 levels (2.3 million, 2.5 million, and 2.4 million, respectively). The average age at first nonmedical use of pain relievers was 21.0 years.
  • In 2010, the number of new nonmedical users of OxyContin® aged 12 or older was 598,000, with an average age at first use of 22.8 years among those aged 12 to 49. These estimates are similar to those for 2009 (584,000 and 22.3 years, respectively).
  • The majority (55 percent) of persons aged 12 and older who had used prescription pain relievers non-medically in the past 12 months received them from a friend or relative for free. Only 4.4 percent of those misusing pain relievers in the past year reported getting their supply from a drug dealer and 0.4 percent bought it on the Internet.
Heroin
 
  • In 2010, there were 140,000 persons aged 12 or older who had used heroin for the first time within the past 12 months. The average age at first use among recent initiates aged 12 to 49 was 21.3 years, significantly lower than the 2009 estimate (25.5 years).

As in previous years, the 2010 NSDUH shows a vast disparity between the number of people needing specialized treatment for a substance abuse problem and the number who actually receive it. According to the survey, 23.1 million Americans aged 12 or older (9.1 percent) needed specialized treatment for a substance abuse problem, but only 2.6 million (or roughly 11.2 percent of them) received it.

NSDUH is a scientifically conducted annual survey of approximately 67,500 people throughout the country, aged 12 and older. Because of its statistical power, it is the nation’s primary source of statistical information on the scope and nature of many substance abuse behavioral health issues affecting the nation.

The complete survey findings are available at:http://atforum.com/addiction-resources/documents/NSDUH2010.pdf

Source: The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration – September 8, 2011

Abuse of Xanax Leads a Clinic to Halt Supply

Because of the clamor for the drug, and concern over the striking number of overdoses involving Xanax in Kentucky and across the country, Seven Counties Services, Inc. took an unusual step— its doctors stopped writing new prescriptions for Xanax and its generic version, alprazolam, in April and plan to wean patients off it completely by year’s end.

The experiment will be closely watched in a state that has wrestled with widespread prescription drug abuse for more than a decade and is grasping for solutions as it claims more lives by the week. While Kentucky and other states have focused largely on narcotic painkiller addiction, experts say that benzodiazepines, the class of sedatives that includes Xanax, are also widely misused or abused, often with grim consequences.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/14/us/in-louisville-a-centers-doctors-cut-off-xanax-prescriptions.html

Source: The New York Times – September 14, 2011

Medical Misuse of Controlled Medications Among Adolescents

adolescent medical misuse

Objectives – To determine the past-year medical misuse prevalence for four controlled medication classes (pain, stimulant, sleeping, and antianxiety) among adolescents, and to assess substance use outcomes among adolescents who report medical misuse.

Design – A Web-based survey was self-administered by 2,744 secondary school students in 2009-2010.

Setting - Two southeastern Michigan school districts.

Participants - The sample had a mean age of 14.8 years and was 51.1% female. The racial/ethnic distribution was 65.0% white, 29.5% African American, 3.7% Asian, 1.3% Hispanic, and 0.5% other.

Main Outcome Measures - Past-year medical use and misuse of 4 controlled medication classes.

Results - Eighteen percent of the sample reported past-year medical use of at least one prescribed controlled medication. Among past-year medical users, 22.0% reported misuse of their controlled medications, including taking too much, intentionally getting  high, or using to increase alcohol or other drug effects. Medical misusers were more likely than nonmisusers to divert their controlled medications and to abuse other substances. The odds of a positive screening result for drug abuse were substantially higher among medical misusers (adjusted odds ratio, 7.8; 95% confidence interval, 4.3-14.2) compared with medical users who used their controlled medications appropriately. The odds of drug abuse did not differ between medical users who used their controlled medications appropriately and nonusers.

The article abstract can be accessed at: http://archpedi.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/165/8/729

Source: Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine – August 8, 2011

Buprenorphine Diversion May Signal Need For More MAT and Greater Oversight

obstaclesAs more buprenorphine is prescribed in physicians’ offices to treat opioid addiction, the potential for diversion and misuse increases. But people buying buprenorphine on the street are not generally doing so for its euphoric effects. Most are taking it because they are dependent on heroin or prescription opioids, or both, and want to prevent withdrawal symptoms between “highs,” according to Jane C. Maxwell, PhD. Dr. Maxwell, a research professor at the Addiction Research Institute at the University of Texas at Austin, is an epidemiologist who studies drug abuse trends nationwide. She tells AT Forum that the amount of the drug being prescribed reflects increasing demand for opioid treatment.

Background

The Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 (DATA) made it possible for any licensed physician to treat opioid addiction with Schedule III, IV, and V medications in their private offices by obtaining a federal waiver. Buprenorphine is a Schedule III drug. Methadone, a Schedule II drug, is not covered by DATA.

Two formulations of buprenorphine are approved under DATA: Subutex (buprenorphine), and Suboxone (buprenorphine with naloxone) (naloxone is added as a protection against abuse and diversion). Suboxone, the most commonly prescribed form of buprenorphine, comes as sublingual tablets and as a sublingual film. Both dissolve under the tongue. Generic buprenorphine without naloxone also is available.

As part of DATA 2000, the federal government required additional protection against buprenorphine diversion:

  • An eight-hour training course for physicians approved by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).
  • Physician registration with the federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).
  • Regulatory limitations on the number of patients a physician may treat at any one time. DATA’s initial allowance of up to 30 patients was increased to 100 patients in 2006.
  • Physicians must have the capacity to provide counseling, or to refer patients for it.

Buprenorphine Abuse and Supply Increases Linked

Buprenorphine was first approved for treating opioid dependence in 2002. Within two years the DEA was issuing warnings about buprenorphine abuse, especially in the Northeast. Nicholas Reuter, MPH, senior public health advisor for the division of pharmacologic therapies at SAMHSA’s Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, told AT Forum in May that buprenorphine diversion is a “significant concern.”

Diversion and abuse increase with supply, Mr. Reuter says. The New England and Southern regions have the highest buprenorphine supply, and highest diversion rates. “The more you prescribe and the more that’s available and out there, the more that can bleed out into the illicit market.”

Put in context however, buprenorphine abuse “pales in comparison to other prescription opioids,” says Mr. Reuter. “We have a prescription drug abuse problem in the United States that Suboxone is a part of, but the abuse levels are dramatically less than for other opioids.”

Reasons and Sources For Diverted Buprenorphine

An ethnographic study in Massachusetts and Vermont found that Suboxone is used to avoid opioid withdrawal when preferred opioids are not available or are too expensive, says Mr. Reuter. Sixty percent of study participants obtained Suboxone illicitly from an individual holding a legitimate prescription for the medication. When legitimate access to prescription Suboxone was unavailable, participants went to other sources, including 39 percent who went to heroin dealers to purchase the drug, he says.

Diversion and illicit use of Suboxone are increasingly reported in incarcerated populations. Recent news reports tell of Suboxone pills and the new Suboxone film being smuggled into prisons and jails. The tablets have been crushed and mixed with crayons, used to color pictures, then licked off the paper. The film has been tucked behind envelope seams and stamps.

Many recreational drug users are finding buprenorphine readily available, and naïve opioid users feel some euphoria from Suboxone, especially when taken in combination with alcohol or other sedative drugs.

A study presented at the College of Problems on Drug Dependence in June found that the greatest risk factor for misuse of buprenorphine was being unable to get into treatment.

Recent Ohio Report Confirms Buprenorphine Diversion and Increased Need For MAT

Ohio’s most recent surveillance report found that street availability of Suboxone is high in most regions. It’s not clear where the diverted Suboxone is coming from, but the market for it on the street indicates a need for more treatment for opioid addiction, says Orman Hall, director of the Ohio Department of Alcohol and Drug Addiction Services. Mr. Hall tells AT Forum that buprenorphine diversion in the state is now a concern.

The rise in prescription opioid abuse is causing Ohio to change the way it treats addiction, by adding more medication-assisted treatment (MAT), says Mr. Hall. “Historically, Ohio has been anabstinence state. We’re now looking at a number of medications, and we’ll revamp our methadone treatment guidelines as well.”

Should Buprenorphine Regulations Be More Restrictive?

Dr. Maxwell is concerned that if buprenorphine diversion continues to rise, stigma will increase, and policy makers may begin to view it negatively. This would result in heightened controls and reduced
access to all MAT. The unfolding buprenorphine experience with diversion may just reinforce anti-MAT attitudes and make all opioid agonist treatment more restrictive and less accessible.

Finally, while DATA-waived physicians must certify the capacity to refer patients for counseling, counseling is not required with buprenorphine treatment. A SAMHSA/CSAT evaluation conducted in 2007 indicated considerable variation in the amount of counseling provided by DATA-waived physicians. Some prescribing physicians are not providing counseling on a regular basis, according to Mr. Reuter. This could contribute to the diversion of prescribed buprenorphine.

Sources

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Division of Pharmacologic Therapies.  Diversion and Abuse of Buprenorphine: A Brief Assessment of Emerging Indicators: Final Report, November 30, 2006. http://buprenorphine.samhsa.gov/Buprenorphine_FinalReport_12.6.06.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2001.

Information on buprenorphine, the DATA 2000 Act, and other aspects of buprenorphine therapy: CSAT Buprenorphine Information Center.  http://buprenorphine.samhsa.gov/. Accessed August 1, 2011.

Monte AA, Mandell T, Wilford BB, Tennyson J, Boyer EW. Diversion of buprenorphine/naloxone coformulated tablets in a region with high prescribing prevalence. PMID: 2015559. ISSN:1055-0887 print; 1545-0848, online. DOI: 10.1080/10550880903014767 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20155591. Accessed August 1, 2011.

JR Havens, M Lofwall, CG Leukefeld, Individual and network determinants of buprenorphine misuse among rural prescription opioid users. (presented at CPDD 73rd Annual Meeting, June 2011, abstract #282). http://www.cpdd.vcu.edu/Pages/Meetings/CPDD11AbstractBook.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2011.

Economic Impact of Illicit Drug Use in the U.S.

Societal costs of illicit drug use were $193 billion in 2007, according to a report out this spring from the National Drug Intelligence Center, part of the federal Department of Justice. Included were costs due to crime ($61 million), health costs ($11 billion), and productivity costs ($120 billion).

Public costs of specialty treatment totaled $3.3 billion: $650 million for methadone programs, $1 billion for other outpatient programs, $1.2 billion for residential programs, and $465 million for detoxification. These figures apply to treatment for what the report calls “illicit drug use,” which includes heroin use and prescription drug misuse.

The report also looks at the difference between “instrumental offenses”–such as larceny committed by a heroin addict in order to purchase drugs—with “related offenses,” such as murder committed while under the influence of a drug like cocaine. The report categorizes instrumental offenses as those that would not have occurred absent the addiction—in other words, the heroin addict would not have stolen if he or she had not had to purchase illicit drugs.

For the report, The Economic Impact of Illicit Drug Use on American Society, go to http://atforum.com/addiction-resources/documents/economicimpact.pdf.

Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions for Benzodiazepine Abuse Triple

The number of patients admitted to substance abuse treatment who report benzodiazepine abuse tripled from 1998 to 2008, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) reported in June. In 1998, benzodiazepines were involved—not necessarily as the primary drug of abuse—in 22,400 admissions. Ten years later, this number had grown to 60,200.

Substance Abuse Treatment AdmissionsBenzodiazepines were rarely the only drug used, or even the primary drug. In 82.1 percent of the cases, benzodiazepines were the secondary drug of abuse, with opioids (54 percent) usually the primary drug—a pattern that roughly held true for nearly every age group except adolescents and those aged 45 and older (see chart).

One major public health concern with multiple drug abuse is the risk of overdose. The SAMHSA report notes that “abuse of benzodiazepines in combination with other substances can have severe and sometimes fatal consequences.”

The report, based on the Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS), was released by SAMHSA in June 2011. The report collects information from providers on the primary substance of abuse, and up to two additional substances, at admission to treatment.

The TEDS Report, Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions for Abuse of Benzodiazepines, can be found at: http://atforum.com/addiction-resources/documents/TEDS028BenzoAdmissions.pdf.

Study: Benzodiazepine Use by OTP Patients May Indicate Untreated Anxiety

A recent study based on an anonymous survey of methadone patients in a Baltimore, Maryland opioid treatment program (OTP) found that more than half of benzodiazepine users attending group meetings had started using these drugs after entering methadone maintenance (MM) treatment.

The authors caution that their study results should not be used to make clinic policy, or to change operations. This article could be helpful to OTPs as they try to deal with the issue of benzodiazepine abuse.

“The study findings suggest that most methadone programs do not address co-occurring anxiety problems,” the authors concluded. Further study is needed “to develop effective treatments that will simultaneously target addiction symptoms, anxiety disorders,” and misuse of benzodiazepines.

The authors noted that benzodiazepine misuse increases the risk for relapse and overdose.

The study, Benzodiazepine Use and Misuse Among Patients in a Methadone Program, by Kevin W. Chen et al, is published in BMC Psychiatry, May 19, 2011. The article is available for free download at: http://atforum.com/addiction-resources/documents/Benzodiazepines.pdf.

Site last updated May 15, 2012 @ 3:33 am